7.29-30
mayavadi, karma-nistha kutarkika-gana
nindaka, pasandi yata paduya adhama
sei saba mahadaksa dhana palaila
sei vanya ta-sabare chunite narila
SYNONYMS
mayavadi—the impersonalist philosophers; karma-nistha—the fruitive workers; kutarkika-gana—the false logicians; nindaka—the blasphemers; pasandi—nondevotees; yata—all; paduya—students; adhama—the lowest class; sei saba—all of them; maha-daksa—they are very expert; dhana—running; palaila—went away; sei vanya—that inundation; ta-sabare—all of them; chunite—touching; narila—could not.
The impersonalists, fruitive workers, false logicians, blasphemers, nondevotees and lowest among the student community are very expert in avoiding the Krsna consciousness movement, and therefore the inundation of Krsna consciousness cannot touch them.
PURPORT
Like Mayavadi philosophers in the past such as Prakasananda Sarasvati of Benares, modern impersonalists are not interested in Lord Caitanya’s Krsna consciousness movement.
They do not know the value of this material world; they consider it false and cannot understand how the Krsna consciousness movement can utilize it.
They are so absorbed in impersonal thought that they take it for granted that all spiritual variety is material.
Because they do not know anything beyond their misconception of the brahmajyoti, they cannot understand that Krsna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is spiritual and therefore beyond the conception of material illusion.
Whenever Krsna incarnates personally or as a devotee, these Mayavadi philosophers accept Him as an ordinary human being.
This is condemned in the Bhagavad-gita (9.11):
avajananti mam mudha
manusim tanum asritam
param bhavam ajananto
mama bhuta-mahesvaram “Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form.
They do not know My transcendental nature as the Supreme Lord of all that be.” There are also other unscrupulous persons who exploit the Lord’s appearance by posing as incarnations to cheat the innocent public.
An incarnation of God should pass the tests of the statements of the sastras and also perform uncommon activities.
One should not accept a rascal as an incarnation of God but should test his ability to act as the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
For example, Krsna taught Arjuna in the Bhagavad-gita, and Arjuna also accepted Him as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but for our understanding Arjuna requested the Lord to manifest His universal form, thus testing whether He was actually the Supreme Lord.
Similarly, one must test a so-called incarnation of Godhead according to the standard criteria.
To avoid being misled by an exhibition of mystic powers, it is best to examine a so-called incarnation of God in the light of the statements of the sastras.
Caitanya Mahaprabhu is described in the sastras as an incarnation of Krsna; therefore if one wants to imitate Lord Caitanya and claim to be an incarnation, he must show evidence from the sastras about his appearance to substantiate his claim.